Note by the Translator: This bold manifesto was written in 1984 to introduce the first volume of the Social Aesthetic Studies entitled “Charter of Humanity – The Principles of the General Anthroposophical Society as a Basis for Life and Path of Training”, often referred to in this essay It is included in this booklet to differentiate Social Organics, which presents a view of the situation of the social body as it is, from Social Aesthetics, which is the social art of changing the situation as is to what it should be.
In
earlier times this series of Social Aesthetic Studies
would hardly have needed a justification for its supply of texts; but
today it probably does. For bringing the social in connection with the
aesthetic seems in view of our present state of affairs only to cause
bewilderment. On the one hand, the conditions in which we are
actively and passively embroiled lack indeed all inducements for good taste,
while, on the other hand, the utilities that we consider necessary in our lives
require at most a glossy varnish, yet scarcely real beauty itself. With every
glance, meanwhile, that goes back more than 150 years we become aware – be it
with amazement or with fright in view of our drab routine or snug
self-deception – what supreme value the previous civilizations attributed to
the harmonious development of their representative appearance; what pride the
great figures of that world took in creating and building an overworld. And the
more we follow the epochs backward to antiquity, the clearer the collective
force of national cultures in works of beauty comes to mind. To
establish the noble was not compulsory labor, but a joyful and glad confession;
existence was not a consumption of impressions, but the horticulture of
expression spreading throughout all branches of the empire. These peoples
became themselves through the fact that they created – not in order to
construct a bulwark of utilities to safeguard their survival – but to paint an
image (however instinctive) of their self-knowledge as that which, in itself,
is bliss and therefore holy.
Social aesthetics
is the science of the future, just as aestheticism in general is the future of
science. A science of aesthetics must establish the future of our civilization,
in so far as our civilization is granted a future at all. Aestheticism as
represented here however, is not aesthetic sentimentality. On the contrary, it
bears witness to cognition, the cognition that is conscious of the basic demand
of our time, because it does justice to the demand that it must direct to
itself. This is the unbiased observation of its own activity. For out of
unformed material of perception it gives rise after all– through the
evidence of the idea – to the consciousness-form of our world. The reality that
is reduced to its primordial state by our sense-organs is not somehow
reproduced in cognition by a process of imitation, but co-produced in the
co-creative act of knowledge. More concerning this is developed in this series
of publications – as well as in other parts of the work by the
author. At the height of his cognitive existence, man is therefore
not merely a squatter jammed by the terror of information and the pressures to
survive into his accidental niche spanned by the force of circumstances. On the
contrary, he is a creative architect of expression, a designer, who even
surmounts his construction of a consciousness-formed world with his own form of
liberty that he forces upwards out of his will to construct. The meaning of
one’s life is to give the world a new meaning in the fulfillment of one’s own
search for meaning, and to recognize and time and again re-examine one’s
creative task in the mirror of the world of expression that one constructs
around oneself. Materialism with its whip of horror and opiate of bliss
has stripped present-day man of the dignity of his mission in life, releasing
him into the waste and squalor of the meaningless void. Social aesthetics is to
reinstall him in his mission and responsibility, not to ensure that he
survives, but that he dare to ‘overbecome’ (German: Überwerden).
If our world does not substitute its superstition of utilitarianism for
enthusiasm for beauty, it will encircle itself with an ever higher – and hence
ever more in danger of collapsing – robot-gigantism, and at the same time
undermine itself with the horror of modern dreariness. The only practical
approach is the aesthetic one. He who counters that life must be lived before
it can be draped with the blossoms of beauty may put up with the answer that it
would be more consequent to depart from such a senseless life that debases
itself in yielding to its fascination of fear and greed, instead of grasping
its spur of its dignity.
The first edition of this series of social-aesthetic
studies contains the revised and enlarged text of The Principles of the
Anthroposophical Society as a Basis of Life and Path of Training that
was long out of print. Added to this were new editions of the also revised and
enlarged essays A Path to the Spiritual Goetheanum and On
the Nature of the Free School of Spiritual Science, which complement the
discourse of the first essay from essential points of view. In the appendix one
will find the text of the ‘Principles' (originally
statutes) of the Anthroposophical Society, which Rudolf Steiner gave
as a basis for reconstituting the Society at the turn of the year 1923/24. In
that way, a publication has come about which can not only help every new member
of the Anthroposophical Society to orientate himself, but which can perhaps
also be welcomed by those wanting to re-evaluate their decision to become
members. This publication is also intended as study-material for those wanting
to occupy themselves – not just in a receptive, but also in a cognitive manner
– with an important field of the spiritual science developed by Rudolf Steiner.
As a social aesthetic study its aim is furthermore to contribute to a better
knowledge of our present state of affairs and to meet the dire needs of our
time.
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten